Monsanto Foods, the mega-corp that wants us all to eat genetically modified corn, spliced with pig genes (among other delicacies) has been handed a big victory by the Supreme Court this week.  The Supremes refused to even hear the complaints of non-GMO farmers about the bad practices of Monsanto, which include bullying tactics that would make Chris Christie jealous.

These farmers have no way to be compensated for their contaminated crops, or challenge the unfair practice of seed patenting.  The Ecologist has more:

The US Supreme Court has issued a decision in the landmark federal lawsuit, Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association et al v. Monsanto.

Farmers were denied the right to argue their case in court and gain protection from potential abuse by the agrichemical and genetic engineering giant, Monsanto.

The decision also dashes the hopes of family farmers who sought the opportunity to prove in court that Monsanto’s genetically engineered seed patents are invalid.

Safeguards ‘insufficient’

“The Supreme Court failed to grasp the extreme predicament family farmers find themselves in”, said Maine organic seed farmer Jim Gerritsen, President of lead plaintiffOSGATA.

“The Court of Appeals agreed our case had merit. However, the safeguards they ordered are insufficient to protect our farms and our families.

“This high court which gave corporations the ability to patent life forms in 1980, and under Citizens United in 2010 gave corporations the power to buy their way to election victories, has now in 2014 denied farmers the basic right of protecting themselves from the notorious patent bully Monsanto.”

1 million citizens and 25% of organic farmers …

The historic lawsuit was filed in 2011 in Federal District Court in Manhattan. The large plaintiff group numbers 83 individual American and Canadian family farmers, independent seed companies and agricultural organizations whose combined memberships total over 1 million citizens, including many non-GMO farmers and over 25% of North America’s certified organic farmers.

“The Appellate Court decision could leave Canadian farmers out in the cold because their protection may not extend to Canada at all”, said Saskatchewan organic grain farmer Arnold Taylor, a member of plaintiff member Canadian Organic Growers (COG).

“Like many Canadian farmers, we sell crop into the United States and can therefore be liable to claims of patent infringement by Monsanto.”

In a complicated ruling issued in June 2013 by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington DC, American farmers were handed a partial victory when the three justices agreed with the farmers’ assertion that contamination by Monsanto was inevitable.

The justices ordered Monsanto not to sue American farmers whose fields were contaminated with trace amounts of patented material, which the Court defined as 1%.

Meanwhile in Canada

In a related situation, Canadian soybean farmer Stephen Webster of Ontario experienced just how abusively Monsanto treats innocent contamination victims.

Through no fault of his own Webster, who farms with his elderly father, had his 2012 identify-preserved (IP) non-GMO soybean crop contaminated by Monsanto’s patented genetically engineered seed. Their soybeans were ruined for export to specialty markets in Japan.

“First Monsanto claimed we had too many bees and that we were at fault for the contaminated crop”, said Webster. “Then they threatened to run up $100,000 in legal bills that we would have to pay.”

Tragically, Webster’s story is the norm in farm country, with Monsanto using its extreme economic power to silence family farmers even before they can legally defend themselves.

Unwanted GMO seed has cost farmers $2 billion

Notably, none of the plaintiffs are customers of Monsanto. None have signed licensing agreements with Monsanto. The plaintiffs do not want Monsanto’s seed and they do not want Monsanto’s gene-spliced technology and have sought legal protection from significant economic harm to their businesses and way of life.

“We have a fourth generation farm”, said organic dairy farmer and plaintiff Rose Marie Burroughs of California Cloverleaf Farms.

“Monsanto cannot be trusted. Their refusal to provide a binding legal covenant not to sue our fellow farmers would make anyone wonder, what are their real motives? GMO contamination levels can easily rise above 1% and then we would have zero protection from a costly and burdensome lawsuit.”

Significant contamination events, including Starlink corn and LibertyLink rice, have already cost farmers and the food companies nearly $2 billion.

In the past year alone, the discovery of Monsanto’s illegal GMO wheat in an Oregon farmer’s field and GMO alfalfa in Washington state sent foreign markets, where GMOs are not wanted, reeling. In both instances farmers’ economic livelihoods were put at risk as buyers in foreign markets refused to buy the GMO contaminated crops.

Justice denied

Dave Murphy, founder and executive director of Food Democracy Now!, a grassroots advocacy group based in Iowa and a plaintiff in the case, said:

“If Monsanto can patent seeds for financial gain, they should be forced to pay for contaminating a farmer’s field, not be allowed to sue them. Once again, America’s farmers have been denied justice, while Monsanto’s reign of intimidation is allowed to continue in rural America.”

“Monsanto has effectively gotten away with stealing the world’s seed heritage and abusing farmers for the flawed nature of their patented seed technology. This is an outrage of historic proportions and will not stand.”

Meanwhile, has Chris Christie’s bridge blunder opened the Presidential door to Jeb Bush? Listen LIVE at 9PM ET for these and other soothing bedtime stories from the far-flung-fringes of the flying-monkey right!

Truthseekers, please watch this video from Sanchez.  He is facing serious consequences from unemployment and needs your help.  You can email him here: Thank you for the many ways you keep it lit!


Check out the PV channel on TuneIn!

Follow us on Twitter @mikemalloyshow #truthseeker

Call 877-996-2556 to testify truth to power!


We are very close to beginning our new videostream and the Malloy:Uncensored video episodes!  Thanks to all our wonderful Kickstarter supporters who helped make this possible!

Please consider our Malloy Show sponsorships to advertise your small business at bargain rates, send a greeting, or spread the word about your favorite political cause. You get the bargain-priced air-time and support the program at the same time, it’s a win-win!

We operate outside the traditional advertising system, so we have no corporate masters to appease.  So we rely on your podcast subscriptions, paypal donations, and sponsorship hours to keep on keeping it lit!  Click on the links above to be a part of the radio revolution!

Thanks for all you do to keep it lit!

Help return Progressive Radio to Seattle!

This article has 3 comments

  1. Capt. Mary in Memphis

    The despicable murderers at Monsanto are now getting a GMO wheat ready for market [], plus other disgusting, filthy “pharmacrops” that produce/contain drugs, plus a new herbicide that has more Agent Orange ingredients than Roundup. Corrupt FDA and corrupt USDA have fast-track prooval policies now for the terrorists at Monsanto. WE NEED A NATIONAL STRIKE. Have you contacted your organizations yet to demand one? I like May 23. What about you? – I’m still writing the orgaizations on my list and have tweaked the letter again to make it shorter and more emphatic.

  2. Jon in Maryland

    I wonder if GMO foods are a technological equivalent of pumping air into bags of food to sell the same volume of actual food but raise the volume, and price, of the package to sell. Potato and tortilla chip bags have been puffed with air and chocolate bars have been packed with cardboard expanders to make the food look bigger for years. Because which gene within the plant is modified is secret and for what purpose (proprietary business info) no one but Big Food Corporations (that resist GMO labelling in the USA and Canada) know. Could the genes that actually are modified be to raise the amount of gluten within grains so that, when eaten, people feel satiated (full) and don’t feel hungry for any other foods to ‘balance’ their diet, but are actually gaining no nutritional benefit for the calories consumed (definition of ‘junk food’). A portion of people eating the possibly unnaturally high gluten levels show the neurological problems that many identify as either celiac disease or ‘leaky gut’ that lessen or disappear when following a GF (gluten free) diet. The film “Genetic Roulette” that Free Speech TV showed, and gave away dvds of as fundraising perks, had examples of parents of autistic children who were able to function better on a GF diet.

    Could genetically raising the amount of gluten in grains be a high technology equivalent of selling lower quantities of, cheaper to produce, food in a deceptively high quantity package allowing higher prices like pumping air into chip bags and breakfast cereal bags packed within boxes that still leaves consumers satiated (full) but not nourished? The modern working life where people have to work longer or at two or 3 jobs to earn a living paycheck (or at least be ‘on call’ on a ‘contingency’ basis) makes work-life balance harder starting with fitting in time to shop for and prepare healthier meals. Any other meaningful, if not lucrative, life activity a person may wish to pursue, such as activism to resist the corporate-driven economic and political transition from democracy to corporatism (Italian fascism under Mussolini or Spanish fascism under Franco to avoid godwin’s law), also gets squeezed out.

    If anyone reading this can afford to travel to a country that requires GMO labeling I humbly suggest a trip to a grocery store in the country one travels to in order to search for similar food products sold in the USA and use one’s cell phone camera to take a picture of any labels of GMO ingredients found. Share the pictures when one returns home to the USA and Canada (with less labeling laws) and outsource the compliance with other countries labeling requirements to the USA and Canada as the big corporations have outsourced their labor markets (to cut their payrolls) and capital reserves (to evade taxes).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *